Serveur d'exploration sur la télématique

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Network policy formation between idealist and strategic models: a political economy perspective from Turkey

Identifieur interne : 004435 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 004434; suivant : 004436

Network policy formation between idealist and strategic models: a political economy perspective from Turkey

Auteurs : Haluk Geray [Turquie]

Source :

RBID : ISTEX:02C2CC8F07F10DFD7CF3F24851443F1F186A1812

Abstract

Two models of telecom reform, the Idealist and the Strategic, can be applied to the network policy formation process. The Idealist model, which is manifested in the rhetoric of the emerging global governance regime of telecommunication networks, amounts to a policy of exclusion in developing countries not only in the sense of teledensity, but also regarding the network policy formation process as well. The scope of the policy sphere has been reduced to purportedly competitive markets ignoring socio-economic development, the economy as a whole, local production and technology capabilities, research and development, innovation systems and the potential for using markets as instruments. Disconnecting long-range planning of the government and “independent regulator's” policies can be added to the list of excluded possibilities. Based on Turkey's experience, the strategic model is more appropriate both for understanding the formation of network policies and for designing participatory policy formation mechanisms. As the number of agents involved in the policy formation process diversifies and increases in the true sense, outcomes more closely resemble a Strategic approach. Thus, in trying to understand network policy formation, a new dimension should be added to the Strategic/Idealist dichotomy: top–down or participatory.

Url:
DOI: 10.1016/S0308-5961(99)00033-6


Affiliations:


Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)


Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title>Network policy formation between idealist and strategic models: a political economy perspective from Turkey</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Geray, Haluk" sort="Geray, Haluk" uniqKey="Geray H" first="Haluk" last="Geray">Haluk Geray</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:02C2CC8F07F10DFD7CF3F24851443F1F186A1812</idno>
<date when="1999" year="1999">1999</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1016/S0308-5961(99)00033-6</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/02C2CC8F07F10DFD7CF3F24851443F1F186A1812/fulltext/pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">003B52</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">003B52</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">003B52</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">003153</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Checkpoint">003153</idno>
<idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0308-5961:1999:Geray H:network:policy:formation</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">004554</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">004435</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">004435</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title level="a">Network policy formation between idealist and strategic models: a political economy perspective from Turkey</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Geray, Haluk" sort="Geray, Haluk" uniqKey="Geray H" first="Haluk" last="Geray">Haluk Geray</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<country xml:lang="fr">Turquie</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Ankara University, Communication Faculty, Cebeci, Ankara</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>Ankara</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series>
<title level="j">Telecommunications Policy</title>
<title level="j" type="abbrev">JTPO</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0308-5961</idno>
<imprint>
<publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher>
<date type="published" when="1999">1999</date>
<biblScope unit="volume">23</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">6</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="495">495</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="511">511</biblScope>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">0308-5961</idno>
</series>
<idno type="istex">02C2CC8F07F10DFD7CF3F24851443F1F186A1812</idno>
<idno type="DOI">10.1016/S0308-5961(99)00033-6</idno>
<idno type="PII">S0308-5961(99)00033-6</idno>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt>
<idno type="ISSN">0308-5961</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass></textClass>
<langUsage>
<language ident="en">en</language>
</langUsage>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Two models of telecom reform, the Idealist and the Strategic, can be applied to the network policy formation process. The Idealist model, which is manifested in the rhetoric of the emerging global governance regime of telecommunication networks, amounts to a policy of exclusion in developing countries not only in the sense of teledensity, but also regarding the network policy formation process as well. The scope of the policy sphere has been reduced to purportedly competitive markets ignoring socio-economic development, the economy as a whole, local production and technology capabilities, research and development, innovation systems and the potential for using markets as instruments. Disconnecting long-range planning of the government and “independent regulator's” policies can be added to the list of excluded possibilities. Based on Turkey's experience, the strategic model is more appropriate both for understanding the formation of network policies and for designing participatory policy formation mechanisms. As the number of agents involved in the policy formation process diversifies and increases in the true sense, outcomes more closely resemble a Strategic approach. Thus, in trying to understand network policy formation, a new dimension should be added to the Strategic/Idealist dichotomy: top–down or participatory.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<affiliations>
<list>
<country>
<li>Turquie</li>
</country>
</list>
<tree>
<country name="Turquie">
<noRegion>
<name sortKey="Geray, Haluk" sort="Geray, Haluk" uniqKey="Geray H" first="Haluk" last="Geray">Haluk Geray</name>
</noRegion>
</country>
</tree>
</affiliations>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/TelematiV1/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 004435 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 004435 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Ticri/CIDE
   |area=    TelematiV1
   |flux=    Main
   |étape=   Exploration
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     ISTEX:02C2CC8F07F10DFD7CF3F24851443F1F186A1812
   |texte=   Network policy formation between idealist and strategic models: a political economy perspective from Turkey
}}

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.31.
Data generation: Thu Nov 2 16:09:04 2017. Site generation: Sun Mar 10 16:42:28 2024